Part 2 — Downloading
In the last post, we benchmarked the uploading speed of LSWS 4.2.2 (with Ruby LSAPI 4.1) against Nginx with Passenger for a Ruby Rails Rack application. But rewindableinput was not our only change in Ruby LSAPI 4.1. (more…)
In the last post, we benchmarked the uploading speed of LSWS 4.2.2 (with Ruby LSAPI 4.1) against Nginx with Passenger for a Ruby Rails Rack application. But rewindableinput was not our only change in Ruby LSAPI 4.1. (more…)
To perform a fair benchmark requiring a lot of preparation, as you need to know the detail of each product and set appropriate configuration. Recently, we got chance to do some internal testing. (more…)
We haven’t done benchmarks since LSWS 2.0 due to various reasons… People may discount what we say because this is a vendor version… The main reason is that we are really busy with other high-priority things, like new feature enhancement, bug fixes and support… We treat every user’s feedback seriously. So to answer those people who request new benchmark, YES, we know it is OVERDUE, and it is on our TODO list after 4.1 stable released. (more…)
I simply couldn’t believe it when I saw a benchmark result that FCGI beats LSAPI, (more…)
After reading [Scoundrel's blog "Looking for Optimal Solution: Benchmark Results Summary and Findings"](http://blog.kovyrin.net/2006/08/28/ruby-performance-results/), I am pretty surprised that LSWS + LSAPI falls behind. The best performer in his tests is nginx + FCGI. “All right, let me spend some time benchmarking them.” I said to myself. (more…)
We here at LiteSpeed feels like it’s about time for a company blog where we can muse about internal/external affairs and add give us another way to reach out to our growing community. (more…)