Posts Tagged ‘Performance’
Thursday, February 14th, 2013
4.2.2 New Features: REFRESH Cache, Stale Cache Mechanism
1. How to REFRESH/PURGE cache manually
/usr/local/lsws/admin/misc>/usr/local/lsws/admin/fcgi-bin/admin_php purge_cache_byurl.php
Synopsis: php purge_cache_byurl.php -(r|p) domain url [server_ip] [port]-r: refresh cache (use stale cache while updating cache)
-p: purge cache (delete cache entry) (more…)
Tags: 4.2.2, litespeed cache, lsws, Performance, refresh, stale cache, Update
Posted in Cache, Performance, Web Server | 1 Comment »
Tuesday, February 12th, 2013
Part 1 — Uploading
Now that we’ve finished tweaking the latest update of LiteSpeed’s SAPI for Ruby on Rails with Rack, we decided to celebrate with a little benchmarking. (more…)
Tags: 4.2.2, benchmark, lsapi, lsws, nginx, passenger, Performance, rack, rails, ruby, speed, upload
Posted in Benchmarks, Performance, Ruby | 2 Comments »
Tuesday, September 11th, 2012
LSWS 4.2 release has a great news for shared hosting providers, who can get most advantages of the much expected new feature. This release introduces PHP suEXEC daemon mode, (more…)
Tags: 4.2, daemon, lsws, Performance, php, shared hosting, suexec
Posted in Performance, PHP, Web Server | 1 Comment »
Friday, January 28th, 2011
LiteSpeed has provided a built-in cache functionality (an advanced feature for Enterprise 2+CPU licenses) since version 4.0 (March, 2009), and keeps improving this feature through subsequent 4.0.x releases. Many of you maybe still not aware of the powerfulness of this feature. (more…)
Tags: litespeed cache, lsws, Performance, vBulletin
Posted in Cache, Performance, Web Server | 2 Comments »
Wednesday, December 16th, 2009
To perform a fair benchmark requiring a lot of preparation, as you need to know the detail of each product and set appropriate configuration. Recently, we got chance to do some internal testing. (more…)
Tags: 4.1, Apache, lsws, nginx, passenger, Performance, rails, REE, ruby, speed, upload
Posted in Benchmarks, Performance, Ruby, Web Server | No Comments »
Wednesday, December 9th, 2009
We haven’t done benchmarks since LSWS 2.0 due to various reasons… People may discount what we say because this is a vendor version… The main reason is that we are really busy with other high-priority things, like new feature enhancement, bug fixes and support… We treat every user’s feedback seriously. So to answer those people who request new benchmark, YES, we know it is OVERDUE, and it is on our TODO list after 4.1 stable released. (more…)
Tags: 4.1, benchmark, copy-on-write, lsws, memory usage, Performance, REE, ruby, speed
Posted in Benchmarks, Performance, Ruby, Web Server | No Comments »
Thursday, August 31st, 2006
I simply couldn’t believe it when I saw a benchmark result that FCGI beats LSAPI, (more…)
Tags: benchmark, fcgi, lsapi, lsws, Performance, ruby, speed
Posted in Benchmarks, Performance, Ruby, Web Server | No Comments »
Thursday, August 31st, 2006
After reading [Scoundrel's blog "Looking for Optimal Solution: Benchmark Results Summary and Findings"](http://blog.kovyrin.net/2006/08/28/ruby-performance-results/), I am pretty surprised that LSWS + LSAPI falls behind. The best performer in his tests is nginx + FCGI. “All right, let me spend some time benchmarking them.” I said to myself. (more…)
Tags: 2.2, benchmark, fcgi, lsapi, lsws, nginx, Performance, rails, ruby, speed
Posted in Benchmarks, Performance, Ruby, Web Server | No Comments »